This article is an analysis of the current state of fashion and the importance of greenwashing in the industry, done by Pippa Simmonds for Fix that Shirt. Pippa is also a writer at Voir Fashion, which is a free digital fashion magazine that has 4 premium quarterly issues.
Through this article, we aim to spread awareness about the issue of greenwashing. With this PR and marketing tactic being deceptively used by many companies and brands, this article explains how we can all avoid being greenwashed.
So if you are a fashion student, educator, researcher, enthusiast, or a stakeholder in the fashion industry in any way, we invite you to give it a read.
As an industry, fashion is one of the worst polluters: the water use, the toxic dyes and treatments, the use of plastic fabrics and packaging. But at a glance, with the rise of ‘conscious’, ‘responsible’, and the big one: ‘sustainable’ lines by fast fashion retailers; things seem to be improving, right?
If you’re not familiar with the term ‘greenwashing’, it essentially refers to brands that, directly or indirectly, lie about how ethical their company practice is (not to be confused with putting on a separate wash just for your green-hued clothes. Don’t do that. It’s unnecessary).
But by the book, Kent. E Portney’s definition of sustainability is the most widely recognised one, and describes sustainability as ‘meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ (Portney, 2015). But it’s also become something of a trend in recent years, and fashion companies love trends, for obvious reasons. This is why, although your favourite fast fashion retailer may be selling an organic cotton t-shirt in their shiny new sustainable collection, you’re not necessarily making the best decision by buying it. Obviously, organic cotton is better than non-organic cotton, but it still takes over 2,000 litres of water to produce (WWF, 2013). Also, it’s one t-shirt. One t-shirt out of thousands of other garments released by fast fashion brands per year. That is not sustainable.
How do brands use language as a greenwashing tactic?
In what is arguably best described as ‘an age of being able to write anything you like on the internet without repercussions’, you can see how it’s pretty easy for some brands to slip through the net when it comes to having their claims fact-checked. It’s tricky to legislate vague terminology like ‘eco-friendly’, and consequently it’s easy for consumers to accept these terms as confirmation that their shopping habits are to be applauded.
One of the most common terms used when brands are engaging in greenwashing behaviour is ‘reduce’. It’s simple but effective, and here’s why: in the context of sustainability, it implied efforts are being made without necessarily telling us what they are.
For example, if a brand publishes a statement about their intent to ‘reduce environmental impact by 2020’, there’s literally no way to prove otherwise. Even if this just means they are using a tiny percentage of recycled or organic fabric, whilst continuing to release thousands of new lines each month.
How do brands use colours as a greenwashing tactic?
There’s a reason why sustainable fashion has typically been associated with boring, beige linen, and dull colourways. Research has shown that earth tones imply a link with nature, and that the colour green has been associated with eco-friendly products, and connotes positive meanings like “pleasantness, calmness and happiness” (Sundar & Kellaris, 2017).
So, simple psychology means something as subtle as logo colour can influence our perception of a brand. That’s literal greenwashing.
To use a tired example: a certain European fast fashion brands have always used a specific shade of green for the hangtags and branding of their infamous ‘conscious’ collection, with campaigns and ads for the line typically featuring muted tones and ‘natural’ settings.
However, for a garment to actually qualify for the line, it only has to contain ‘50% sustainable materials’. In 2019, this particular brand also claimed that due to ‘quality restraints’, items in the collection could not contain more than 20% recycled cotton. How very conscious of them!
How can I tell if a brand is using greenwashing tactics?
If a brand is greenwashing, their claims will be vague. Unless they’ve published totally transparent details of what goes on down their production line, there are questions to be asked.
If you’re really in doubt, ask them yourself:
Like this article? Join us in creating a more ethical fashion ecosystem by spreading the word!
Bibliography
Portney, K.E. (2015). Sustainability, (1st ed.) London. England.
WWF. (2013). The Impact of a Cotton T-Shirt. [online] WWF. Available at: worldwildlife.org
Sundar, A. & Kellaris, J.J. (2017). How Logo Colors Influence Shoppers’ Judgements of Retailer Ethicality: The Mediating Role of Perceived Eco-Friendliness: JBE JBE. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(3), pp.685-701.
Wenzhong, Z. & Jingyi, L. (2013). A Pragmatic Study on the Functions of Vague Language in Commercial Advertising. English Language Teaching. 6, pp.103-112.
The True Cost. (2015). Directed by Ross, M. [Amazon Prime Video] Available at: amazon.co.uk
This article helps you understand why do we need a material revolution in fashion, what are the new materials that are entering the market and how can we be a part of this changing face of fashion.
This article does not only take you through the technical aspects of Chanderi weaving but also taps on the emotions of the weavers for their traditional textile.
What is greenwashing, how are fashion brands using this tactic to hide the real cost of fashion and how can you avoid being greenwashed!
We would love to help you share an interesting story/topic with the world by posting it on our blog and also promoting it on all of our social media platforms while giving you the credit for your article. The only thing we are looking for is great, inspiring content worth sharing with the world. So if you think that you have got it, register today!
